Crane Compare Banner - Compare construction cranes

Compare Cranes. Choose Smarter.

ICE 222 VS ACE 16XW Comparison

ICE 222

ICE 222

₹ 0.8 L - 0.9 L

ACE 16XW

ACE 16XW

₹ 22 L - 26 L

Add third crane to compare

Engine

Engine Make
Kirloskar
ACE crane engine
Engine Model
4R1040
ACE‑A50 / ACE‑A65 (CEV BS‑III)
Engine Displacement
3900 cc
8300 cc
Engine Power
140 HP
49.5 HP
Maximum Torque
250 Nm
300 Nm
Fuel Type
Diesel
Diesel

Overall Dimension & Weight

Overall Length
6500 mm
4900 mm
Overall Width
2400 mm
2500 mm
Overall Height
3100 mm
2600 mm
Wheel Base
3100 mm
4900 mm
Min Ground Clearance
320 mm
280 mm
Operating Weight
2800 kg
16000 kg

Boom & Lifting

Crane Type
Pick and Carry Crane
Pick‑and‑Carry Hydraulic Crane
Boom Type
Telescopic boom
Telescopic three‑part hydraulic
Boom Length
18 m
16 m
Max Lifting Height
12 m
20 m
Max Working Radius
10 m
18 m

Rated Capacity

Max Lifting Capacity
2.500 t
16 t
Rated Load
7 t
16 t
Capacity at Min Radius
7 t @ 3 m
16 t @ ~3 m
Capacity at Max Radius
1t @ 15 m
2–3 t @ ~16–18 m

Hydraulic System

Pump Type
Gear pump
Gear / Vane pump
Main Pump Capacity
80 Lpm
200 Lpm
Max Hydraulic Flow
120 Lpm
250 Lpm
System Pressure
250 bar
260 bar

Service Capacities

Engine Oil
12 L
10 L
Rear Axle Oil
6 L
10 L
Transmission Oil
10 L
30 L
Hydraulic System
180 L
120 L
Fuel Tank
120 L
50 L
Cooling System
18 L
20 L

Steering & Brakes

Steering Type
Rigid steering axle
Lever‑operated mechanical steering
Turning Radius
7 m
6.5 m
Service Brake Type
Hydraulic / Air assisted brakes
Air‑operated S‑cam on front & disc on rear
Parking Brake Type
Mechanical hand break
Pneumatically‑assisted fail‑safe brake

Tyres

Tyre Size
12.00 × 20
11.00×20
No. of Tyres
4
6

Electrical & General

Battery
120
12 V, 88 Ah
Alternator Output
45 A
35 A
Max Travel Speed
25 km/h
28 km/h

ICE 222

like

Pros

  • Compact & Space Efficient
  • Good Lifting Capacity for Class
  • Hydraulic Smooth Operation

ACE 16XW

like

Pros

  • Good lifting capacity for class: 16 t capacity suitable for many construction and material handling jobs.
  • Relatively low price: More cost‑effective compared to larger cranes in the ACE lineup
  • Compact size: Smaller turning radius (~6.5 m) for confined site work