Crane Compare Banner - Compare construction cranes

Compare Cranes. Choose Smarter.

ACE RHINO 90 C VS ACE 16XW Comparison

ACE RHINO 90 C

ACE RHINO 90 C

₹ 11 L - 14 L

ACE 16XW

ACE 16XW

₹ 22 L - 26 L

Add third crane to compare

Engine

Engine Make
Cummins
ACE crane engine
Engine Model
QSB6.7
ACE‑A50 / ACE‑A65 (CEV BS‑III)
Engine Displacement
2700 cc
8300 cc
Engine Power
45 HP
49.5 HP
Maximum Torque
990 Nm
300 Nm
Fuel Type
Diesel
Diesel

Overall Dimension & Weight

Overall Length
7600 mm
4900 mm
Overall Width
5100 mm
2500 mm
Overall Height
3400 mm
2600 mm
Wheel Base
5800 mm
4900 mm
Min Ground Clearance
450 mm
280 mm
Operating Weight
95000 kg
16000 kg

Boom & Lifting

Crane Type
Crawler Crane
Pick‑and‑Carry Hydraulic Crane
Boom Type
Lattice Boom
Telescopic three‑part hydraulic
Boom Length
60 m
16 m
Max Lifting Height
63 m
20 m
Max Working Radius
52 m
18 m

Rated Capacity

Max Lifting Capacity
90 t
16 t
Rated Load
90 t
16 t
Capacity at Min Radius
90@ 3.5
16 t @ ~3 m
Capacity at Max Radius
45 @ 52
2–3 t @ ~16–18 m

Hydraulic System

Pump Type
Variable Displacement Piston
Gear / Vane pump
Main Pump Capacity
250 Lpm
200 Lpm
Max Hydraulic Flow
480 Lpm
250 Lpm
System Pressure
320 bar
260 bar

Service Capacities

Engine Oil
22 L
10 L
Rear Axle Oil
N/A L
10 L
Transmission Oil
20 L
30 L
Hydraulic System
700 L
120 L
Fuel Tank
350 L
50 L
Cooling System
35 L
20 L

Steering & Brakes

Steering Type
Independent Track Steering
Lever‑operated mechanical steering
Turning Radius
0 m
6.5 m
Service Brake Type
Hydraulic Dynamic Brake
Air‑operated S‑cam on front & disc on rear
Parking Brake Type
Spring Applied Hydraulic Release
Pneumatically‑assisted fail‑safe brake

Tyres

Tyre Size
N/A
11.00×20
No. of Tyres
0
6

Electrical & General

Battery
24V / 180Ah
12 V, 88 Ah
Alternator Output
70 A
35 A
Max Travel Speed
1.8 km/h
28 km/h

ACE RHINO 90 C

like

Pros

  • Very Compact & Lightweight
  • Fuel-Efficient Engine
  • Affordable & Economical

ACE 16XW

like

Pros

  • Good lifting capacity for class: 16 t capacity suitable for many construction and material handling jobs.
  • Relatively low price: More cost‑effective compared to larger cranes in the ACE lineup
  • Compact size: Smaller turning radius (~6.5 m) for confined site work