Crane Compare Banner - Compare construction cranes

Compare Cranes. Choose Smarter.

ACE 12XW VS ACE 16XW Comparison

ACE 12XW

ACE 12XW

₹ 13 L - 15 L

ACE 16XW

ACE 16XW

₹ 22 L - 26 L

Add third crane to compare

Engine

Engine Make
Simpson
ACE crane engine
Engine Model
Simpson S433(i) F1
ACE‑A50 / ACE‑A65 (CEV BS‑III)
Engine Displacement
4400 cc
8300 cc
Engine Power
90 HP
49.5 HP
Maximum Torque
440 Nm
300 Nm
Fuel Type
Diesel
Diesel

Overall Dimension & Weight

Overall Length
7200 mm
4900 mm
Overall Width
2500 mm
2500 mm
Overall Height
3250 mm
2600 mm
Wheel Base
3100 mm
4900 mm
Min Ground Clearance
350 mm
280 mm
Operating Weight
8300 kg
16000 kg

Boom & Lifting

Crane Type
Pick & Carry Hydraulic Mobile Crane
Pick‑and‑Carry Hydraulic Crane
Boom Type
Telescopic
Telescopic three‑part hydraulic
Boom Length
12 m
16 m
Max Lifting Height
12.9 m
20 m
Max Working Radius
6.5 m
18 m

Rated Capacity

Max Lifting Capacity
12 t
16 t
Rated Load
12 t
16 t
Capacity at Min Radius
12 t @ 1.5
16 t @ ~3 m
Capacity at Max Radius
12 t @ rated radius
2–3 t @ ~16–18 m

Hydraulic System

Pump Type
Gear / Intra-Vane Pump
Gear / Vane pump
Main Pump Capacity
120 Lpm
200 Lpm
Max Hydraulic Flow
280 Lpm
250 Lpm
System Pressure
350 bar
260 bar

Service Capacities

Engine Oil
8 L
10 L
Rear Axle Oil
10 L
10 L
Transmission Oil
37 L
30 L
Hydraulic System
125 L
120 L
Fuel Tank
50 L
50 L
Cooling System
25 L
20 L

Steering & Brakes

Steering Type
Power Steering
Lever‑operated mechanical steering
Turning Radius
7 m
6.5 m
Service Brake Type
Pneumatically Assisted Hydraulic Brakes
Air‑operated S‑cam on front & disc on rear
Parking Brake Type
Mechanical Parking Brake
Pneumatically‑assisted fail‑safe brake

Tyres

Tyre Size
11.00 x 20-16 PR
11.00×20
No. of Tyres
8
6

Electrical & General

Battery
12
12 V, 88 Ah
Alternator Output
35 A
35 A
Max Travel Speed
28 km/h
28 km/h

ACE 12XW

like

Pros

  • Powerful engine
  • 4WD performance
  • Strong digging & loading capacity

ACE 16XW

like

Pros

  • Good lifting capacity for class: 16 t capacity suitable for many construction and material handling jobs.
  • Relatively low price: More cost‑effective compared to larger cranes in the ACE lineup
  • Compact size: Smaller turning radius (~6.5 m) for confined site work